<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mac Poker &#187; Sports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mac-poker.com/category/sports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mac-poker.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NBA Playoffs</title>
		<link>http://www.mac-poker.com/nba-playoffs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mac-poker.com/nba-playoffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mac-poker.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an improbable last-minute turn of events, the Bulls’ loss coupled with the Sixers impressive win over the Cavs (albeit the Lebron-less Cavs) put the Chicago Bulls in the seventh seed and pit them against the Celtics in Round 1.  For as up-tempo and disciplined as the Bulls have been playing lately, I think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an improbable last-minute turn of events, the Bulls’ loss coupled with the Sixers impressive win over the Cavs (albeit the Lebron-less Cavs) put the <a href="http://www.nba.com/bulls/">Chicago Bulls</a> in the seventh seed and pit them against the Celtics in Round 1.  For as up-tempo and disciplined as the Bulls have been playing lately, I think this was the worst possible match up for them.  Yes, they beat the Celtics once this season, but that was without KG in the lineup. </p>
<p>The Celtics and Bulls both have depth, but the Celtics’ championship experience, bonafide star power and seasoned court leaders, the Bulls don’t have a chance in this one.  I’d expect the Celtics to sweep, and Boston will carry a double-digit line at home, and six or seven points on the road for Game 3.  I don’t see the line changing even if they’re up 3-0 by the time Game 4 rolls around.  In a surprise prediction, I think the Celtics will have a better chance of covering on the road than they will at home.  The Bulls aren’t a bad team by any stretch, they deserve to be in the playoffs, so they can definitely keep things close.</p>
<p>My other favorite <a href="http://www.basketballsportsbook.com/">nba betting</a> first-round match up is out in the Western Conference where the Nuggets face the Hornets.  Talk about up-tempo basketball, this one could see an over of 220 points every game. In a head-to-head “on paper” comparison, the Nuggets hold about every statistical advantage outside of free throw percentage – but the differential isn’t that great.  These teams also split 2-2 during the regular season. </p>
<p>Remember back in 1994 when the Nuggets stunned the Sonics in Round 1, becoming the first eight-seeded team to upset a No. 1?  Yeah, that was the last time the team actually won a playoff round.  Will that change this year?  Honestly, I don’t think it will.  I like the Hornets’ chances and am calling a major upset in the first round, 4-2 Hornets.  At home, the Hornets will be 3 or 4-point favorites, on the road they’ll be 6 or 7-point underdogs.  I wouldn’t bet the farm on this one, but I think the Hornets have more reliable scorers and team players, and in the playoffs that’ll make a bigger difference than it did spread over 82 games of the regular season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mac-poker.com/nba-playoffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
